#062 l Hongkong New World Tower l SHANGHAI l 278m l 60fl

[D-Mac]

Hongkong new World Tower
Shanghai, China

HEIGHT: 278m/913 feet
FLOORS: 60 floors
COMPLETION: 2002
ARCHITECT: Bregman + Hamann Architects

Located in the heart of the Huai Hai Road special development precinct, the 58-storey New World Centre is located along Shanghai’s most prestigious and fastest-growing shopping street. The Centre includes a five-star, 350-room Marriott hotel, retail, business apartments, office space, public parking garage, and multi-storey public open spaces.

http://www.shanghaiguide.com/skyscraper/albums/ShangHigh/acf.sized.jpg

http://tinypic.com/5wq34

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/503/270uo0005.jpg

http://www.dtz.sh.cn/company/Hong%20Kong%20New%20World.jpg

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/503/270shanghahi_hknw.jpg
http://www.bharchitects.com/architecture/portfolio/portfolio_images/port_photos/newworld.jpg

http://tinypic.com/5wq6w

First picture taken from Shanghigh's gallery at http://www.shanghaiguide.com/skyscraper/gallery/albums.php

[SteelCity32]

wow. This one is truly amazing. 10/10

[Sunflower]

I'm not sure about this one actually, it looks great in the renderings but in the photos it's not that impressive, especially the top.

7/10

[Steely Dan]

strange, i am not very familiar with this one, but its form and massing reminds me of the AT&T corporate center in chicago.

the outside seems to have a ricardo bofill thing going on, even though he is not the architect.

its different in a good way, 8/10

[RafflesCity]

7/10

Looks rather dull and I dont like its colour. But it has the potential to be awesome at night.

[Bobdreamz]

it does look better in the renderings but it's an interesting design nontheless....I also like the top as well...8.5/10

[Caledon1981]

i dunno . .this makes me think on it back and forth. . . ill give it time to gro on me. . but for now. . 6/10

[Muse]

A large, very large drainpipe. Looks better in the renderings (so what's new?).

5

[TYW]

8.5/10
this is soooooo COOOOOOOL

[Pablo]

quite beautiful but tall:)

[AG]

Great use of colours, and nice shape, which, as sharptent already pointed out, is similar to Chicago's AT&T Corporate Center.

9/10

[Liz L]

8/10 - Good soaring height, helped by the contrast between white mullions and dark glass, and the tower's indentations and setbacks. The facade is nice and sleek.
The butresses on the base are an interesting touch, but I can't quite tell from the pics how well the base fits in with the tower, and the top doesn't quite seem worthy of the tower either - they needed a few more small setbacks up there, I think...
The tower really stands out here.

[SUNNI]

a nice looking tower with a very pleasing spire it the top...if ya noe what i mean..

[parody24]

This is my favorite building at night. I saw this in Shanghai
a couple of months ago. The lights dance over the entire
structure, all different colors and shapes. It's so playful.
You have to see it in motion to understand why the night
light show is so impressive on this building.

[Tony 175]

Why does it have that name?? Shouldnt it go in HK??

I give it a 7. It looks kind of weird.

[SeeMacau]

8/10
Not bad !!

[Wu-Gambino]

7/10

Looks like a modern version of AT&T Corporate Center.

[mrlinlin]

So great.I like it very much.9.5

[mrlinlin]

So great.I like it very much.9.5:guns1:

[mystad]

I give it a 9. It's very classy.

[kiku99]

pretty good. 8/10

[renell]

good enough 7.5

[enzo]

strange, i am not very familiar with this one, but its form and massing reminds me of the AT&T corporate center in chicago.

Agreed. 7.5/10

[Reaching Skies]

looks ugly. Especially with the over-massive first few floors. Better to demolish it and construct a slim and tall structure like the new 430m tower in HK!:guns1:

[1+2=3]

When you look to the renderings it realy looks a bit like the Rockefeller centre in New York.

[johonbravo]

7.5......it would loook good in a skyline...design not all that great.

[DrumCorpsAlum]

8/10. Will look sharp at night and great in a skyline.

[The Messiah]

The impressions look better then the tower itself.
It's something else so i like that.
Maybe the facade looks a bit cheap.

8.0/10

[bay_area]

I like the Tower but at the same time, 2 spires arent my personal taste.

[New Jack City]

7/10..It's unique, but the colors make it look dull and boring. If they adjusted the colors this one could have been way better. You also don't feel that tallness, when seeing it.

[Evergrey]

<table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by RafflesCity </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top>7/10

Looks rather dull and I dont like its colour. But it has the potential to be awesome at night.</td></tr>
</table>


I agree

4.5

[Wisma]

5.5 I don't like the top at all. The other part of the building looks allright to me.

[airsickpenthousedweller]

The design looks like it's not worked out.

[TropicalSQ744]

Facade is over done.. Much like how the spires are overdone too.. I guess the overdone facade was to hide that this scraper is actually a box! :bash:

7/10

[rj2uman]

6/10 I really can't describe how much I am not impressed with this structure.

[james2390]

nice! 10

[Galactica]

What this building lookig for among world´s top 100 ???

2/10

[Mr.OW]

7.5, great but looks better in the renderings...

[james2390]

it looks like one in chicago

[Dennis]

cool looking tower, but nothing special 7/10

[AtlanticaC5]

7.5/10, looks like At&T Corporate Center

[Wisma]

8/10

Wow nice one indeed. I Rotterdam we have a tower which looks a lot like this one. It's called the Millenium tower.

http://skylinerotterdam.info/forum/album_pic.php?pic_id=618

[SFtoBoise]

7/10

A bit like AT&T Corperate Center in Chicago.

[Patrick]

7

[Fabio]

8.5/10



Maybe because of the photos.

[MCC]

5.5/10

[manx_bkk]

8/10
Nice tower but the rendering looks much better.

[LeCom]

Hmm, very original. It looks pretty tall, at least the vertical effect is nice. Yet, I think it's a bit too industrial and too dirty. 7.5/10.

[sjambler]

7/10.

[baqthier]

Looks like the World Tower in Sydney. 8.5/10

[Aquarius]

3,5/10

[alex3000]

7/10

[mestalla]

5/10

[timothy_tw]

i like the bright color design~ 7.5/10

[ParraMan]

7.5

Would be a fantastic sleek tower if those strips of grey/white weren't there. They look a bit stuck on. Would be better if the strips were a darker colour. Otherwise, a nice tall building with well proportioned setbacks.

[7 World Trade]

looks really high tech and imposing. i really like this one. definitely puxi's best.

9

[skyperu34]

nice design....8

[Mark_from_Shenzhen]

too many unneccessary lines and the atrium looks like a tank, way dumb looking.
6

[Schroedinger's Cat]

6/10

[amsterdam]

280 meters????? it doesn't look like such a tall building!! :weirdo:

[Justadude]

Quite nice. 7.5/10

[yoyo22]

4.5/10

A pretty average building. I like the shape and the double spires but the facade is too busy and the white is not white enough and the dark is not dark enough to pull off what the designers wanted. Also the building is way too pointy.

[Dubai-Lover]

i like it! 8

[David3820]

It looks excellent and very cool at night. 9/10

[xePh3roK]

7/10

i don't likt the color

[Monkey]

Very nice facade, and the roof is great. 9/10

[Zuelas]

8

I like it. Seems as tho it'd be better suited to Chicago

[Imperial]

6/10

[andysimo123]

looks good. 8/10

[DamienK]

Elegant. 8/10

[R@ptor]

9.0/10

[Þróndeimr]

7.5/10

[N/A]

in the name of HK.
9.4/10

[MattSal]

Interesting design, but it seems to be missing some personality. I give it an 8/10.

[Winus]

5/10

[get13]

I'm not sure about this one. 6/10

[Azn_chi_boi]

knda unique(also makes me remind of the AT&T building in CHI). um.....7 I dont really like this style, especially when the building was completed in 2002

[Pengui]

I think this one might be seriously underrated because on the 2nd 3rd and 4th pics of the topic it is actually disaplayed unfinished and with some ugly construction equipment up there. The finished product can be seen on the first pic.

I happen to have some night pics of the tower (I didn't realize it was this one at first, didn't notice it was that tall as I was a bit too far ^^ ). Sorry for they are not too good, I had no tripod and had to use short exposure to capture the color correctly, hence the pics are quite dark.

http://membres.lycos.fr/pengui/ssc/040923_hong_kong_new_world_tower01.jpg

http://membres.lycos.fr/pengui/ssc/040923_hong_kong_new_world_tower02.jpg
(it's the one that changes color from one pic to another).

I also found this pic browsing the web (much better, but I don't know who's the author so can't give credits).
http://membres.lycos.fr/pengui/ssc/1073294259_3894263.jpg

I do like this tower, it turns out quite nice, and the spire looks great. But honestly I think the night show with all the colors is a bit too much of an electricity-wasting craziness ^^
7.

[Phobos]

7/10

It's not bad at all,but it looks too 90's with the facade's patterns

[Latoso]

8.5/10

[Jules]

Reminds me of AT&T Chicago. 8.5.

[Medo]

very nice, 8.5/10

[DarkFenX]

7.5/10

[SoboleuS]

Not very impressive, but looks good. 8/10

[CborG]

7/10

[Principes]

Nice imperial design, 8.5.

[empersouf]

Very good if u see what ugly towrs CHina produces sometimes...
8.5

[inam]

i really like how they have the color thing going on...it make it more fun!

[ROYAL BLUE]

9/10

[EarlyBird]

Quite an interesting design. I can't pick fault in it, but there's something there I don't like. Not sure what it is. 7/10.

[真琴]

9.5

[MIKI]

7/10

[jimm]

8/10

[El_Greco]

9/10

[London]

5. uncool

[Smileyface]

Nice building 8/10

[ItsConanOBrien]

I'll say 8/10, it's a nice modern building.

[FJP]

nice spires,8.5/10

[pali]

amazing 9/10

[Dancer]

Oh baby> I like it. 9.0

[EuroStar]

7.5

[Gerard]

nice but not my type of building. 7/10

[jpq21]

The building is fine, but it should be in Hong Kong.
Especially since it's called Hong Kong New World Tower

[london-b]

Not bad but from some angles ugly, 6.5/10

[jesarm]

6,5/10

[jesarm]

Not special for me

[Oriolus]

9/10. Nice setbacks and nice glass with the white lines really making it great. It's everything At&T isn't. Sensational.

[Accura4Matalan]

7/10

[www.sercan.de]

8,5/10

[Skylandman]

6/10

[Henk]

7.5/10.

[Sinjin P.]

Quite simple. 6.6/10

[FREKI]

7.5/10

[FROM LOS ANGELES]

It's a remakable good looking tower, plus the top is magnific. I wish LA hasd more towers with bizarre shapes.

[Cabman]

Nice looking tower, but I think it will look very dated quickly, hence only 5.

[mtb_nz]

It may be a box shape building, but its an interesting design 8/10

[۩SkyScraper۩]

Amazing 10/10

[ChiLooper]

Nice 8/10

[sharpie20]

7.5/10 reminds me of an unfinished esb

[Han17]

Amazing tower. 10/10

[Reflex]

7/10.

[forvine]

7/10

[Petr]

Asian in a wrong way. 5,5/10

[flashlight]

just 7/10 for me :)

[clarky]

Nice tower 9/10

[Effer]

8.5/10.

[mr_storms]

6.5/10

[warnings]

7/10

[Scruffy88]

it seems like lost potential.
7.10

[marpa]

4/10

[anakin]

7/10

[D_Y2k.2^]

Average building.Give it a 7:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v191/Lovejesse/DSC_4470.jpg

[Skyman]

7/10

[dżimi pejdż]

5/10

[Mosaic]

7.5/10

[MikaGe]

5.5/10

So Shanghai...

[London_guy]

8/10

[LAYZIEDOGG]

very nice 9/10

[forvine]

looks :okay:

[Woko]

it,s a nice tower. 9.5/10

[ZZ-II]

i like it but could be better 8/10

[Nadini]

9.5 love the design

[Tom Ace]

8/10. I don't like the top and it just seems so/so in all aspects.

[(((myx)))]

9.

[mtt16]

8/10 nice

[mannix_10]

9/10

[The Forgotten Shadow]

One of my Hong Kong favourites.. 9/10

[Phanlax]

9.5

The base and colors are great. Wonderful building.

[virarch]

4/10

unsatisfactory

[gutooo]

8/10

[B@dGuYoM]

i dont like the top, but the rest is good 7/10

[Mosaic]

8/10

[Dreamlıneя]

8/10

[lbjeffries]

okay 6.5

[tuga14]

09/10:D

[chinatown]

dun like it
6/10

[chinatown]

One of my Hong Kong favourites.. 9/10

this building is in shanghai,not hongkong :)

[skipperBill]

7.5/10.

[Very Controversial]

7.5/10

[Orienthai]

9/10

[artech21]

2 / 10

uninspired facade and a junkyard top - typical Chinese rubbish design.

[MelboyPete]

I gave it a 7, lighting not bad.

[wiki]

7/10

[FloridaFuture]

facade way overdone, cool shape
6/10

[vincent young]

I like the color combination (deep blue and white, from the pictures). The roof looks messy.

6.5 / 10

[frango1]

3 / 10

[Gummo]

9/10

[hans gruber]

4 /10

Must there be so many beams?

[imani]

4 /10

Must there be so many beams?

HaHa. good question.

5 / 10

[jodie mitchell]

4 / 10

[sumting wong]

4.5 / 10

[Gators Rule]

3 / 10

[W!CKED]

8/10

[Kelsen]

8/10

[Racingfreak]

Not bad 8.5/10 But it's look like lower then 280 meter

[Eureka!]

I like it. 9/10. Modern and glassy.

[allan_dude]

4/10

[VaastuShastra]

7 - kinda bland, and not very futuristic.

[cong san muon nam]

9.5/10

[Miso]

8/10

[Slodi]

not bad but not impressive 8/10

[LMCA1990]

8/10

[pokistic]

9/10

[Astralis]

8/10

[MasonicStage™]

8,5/10

[newyorkrunaway1]

5.5/10

[RON-E]

4/10

shanghai has a lot of great buildings, but im not in love with this one

[LeMoN-SK]

Interesting design, 8.5/10 for me...

[DragonAnime]

I quite like this one. 10/10

[kon133]

4,5/10

[skyscraperboy]

Ewww, what an ugly. Sorry, 7/10.

[Nikkodemo]

Not interesting

6.5/10

[Sound.]

6.0

[incognito_rn]

quite beautiful & tall.

[Wolle]

I like it.

9/10

[Halabalooza]

looks like it was cut short of height! 7

[WAuzzie]

8/10

[Fundador]

awesome 8/10

[Nielsiej13]

8,5/10

[Ton-Tille]

cool 9/10

[stanleymalls]

Classy. Distracting spires. But night pics can change my opinion. 7.

[UtopianSkyscraper]

4/10

[myf282828]

:)8.0.

[thomyorke26]

9 / 10

[luci203]

Not bad 8.5/10 But it's look like lower then 280 meter
Because of the beans... is an optical ilusion... here is a better pic, where you can see the floors better.

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j286/h5forem/S-HongKongNewWorld.jpg
by le niners - flickr

[meds]

5/10

[Mateus_]

8/10

[xever_7]

7.5/10

[Miguel_Prat]

7/10

[UNDECEIVED]

4/10

[stasiua]

8/10

[Rutger1991]

7/10

[Kawasaki_Kragujevac]

9/10

[BlackLukes]

6/10

[briker]

6.5