Great Pyramid | Giza, Egypt [Archive] - SkyscraperCity

PDA

View Full Version : Great Pyramid | Giza, Egypt


Matthieu
December 5th, 2004, 03:33 PM
The Great Pyramid of Giza, (sometimes spelled Gizeh) is the oldest and last remaining of the Seven Wonders of the World and the most famous pyramid in the world. It is presumed to have served as the tomb of the Fourth dynasty Egyptian Pharaoh Khufu (also known under his Greek name Cheops), after whom it is often called "Khufu's pyramid."

The most widely accepted estimate for its date of completion is 2570 BC; it is the oldest and largest of the three great pyramids in the Giza necropolis on the outskirts of modern Cairo, Egypt.

A few hundred metres southwest of Khufu's Great Pyramid lies the slightly smaller pyramid of Khafre, one of Khufu's successors who also built the Great Sphinx, and a few hundred metres further southwest is the pyramid of Menkaure, Khafre's successor, which is about half as tall. Khafre's pyramid appears the tallest on some photographs as it is somewhat steeper and built on higher terrain.

Construction

At construction the Great Pyramid was 146 metres (481 feet) tall, but due to erosion its current height is 137 metres (450 feet). It covers more than 5.5 hectares (13.5 acres) at the base, which is a square of over 235 metres (775 feet) on each side. For four millennia it was the world's tallest building, not being surpassed until the 160-metre tall spire of Lincoln Cathedral was completed in around 1300. The accuracy of work is such that the four sides of the base have only a mean error of 0.6 inch in length and 12 seconds in angle from a perfect square. The sides of the square are aligned quite precisely in North-South and East-West directions. The sides of the pyramid rise at an angle of approximately 51°51′.

The pyramid was constructed of limestone, basalt, and granite stones from two to four tonnes in weight each, adding up to a total estimated weight of some 7 million tonnes, and a volume of 2,600,600 cubic metres. It is the largest Egyptian pyramid. (The Great Pyramid of Cholula, in Mexico is larger in volume.) When originally built, the pyramid had inset facing blocks of polished limestone, creating smooth sides; they have since fallen out, or been recycled for other building projects, leaving the underlying step-pyramid structure visible. (The smooth outer cover is still visible at the very top of Khafre's pyramid.)

he Great Pyramid differs in its internal arrangement from the other pyramids in the area. The greater number of passages and chambers, the high finish of parts of the work, and the accuracy of construction all distinguish it. The chamber which is most normal in its situation is the subterranean chamber; but this is quite unfinished, hardly more than begun. The upper chambers, called the king's and queen's, were completely hidden, the ascending passage to them having been closed by plugging blocks, which concealed the point where it branched upwards out of the roof of the long descending passage. Another passage, which in its turn branches from the ascending passage to the queen's chamber, was also completely blocked up. The object of having two highly-finished chambers in the mass may have been to receive the king and his co-regent (of whom there is some historical evidence), and there is testimony to a sarcophagus having existed in the queen's chamber, in addition to the one found in the king's chamber.

On September 18, 2002, archaeologists used a remote-controlled robot to access a hitherto sealed chamber within the pyramid: the robot drilled a hole in a long-sealed door and poked a fiber-optic camera through. Unfortunately, all that was revealed was another closed door.

In August 2004, two French amateur Egyptologists, Gilles Dormion and Jean-Yves Verd'hurt, believed they had discovered, using new ground-penetrating radar (a technique called microgravimetry) and architectural analysis, a room which — if it exists — is unlikely ever to have been violated, and may still contain the remains of Khufu. Despite the backing of an expert at the French Institute of Oriental Archaeology in Cairo, the pair have been refused permission by the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities to follow up on their findings and prove the room's existence.

Labor

Herodotus, the Greek historian in the 5th century BC, estimated that construction of the Great Pyramid may have required the labor of 100,000 slaves for 30 years. Polish architect Wieslaw Kozinski believed that it took as many as 25 men to transport a 1.5-ton stone block; based on this, he estimated the workforce to be 300,000 men on the construction site, with an additional 60,000 off-site. More recent research suggests that these may be overestimates, however; mathematician Kurk Mendelssohn, for instance, calculated that the labor force may have been 50,000 men at most, while Ludwig Borchardt and Louis Croon placed the number at 36,000. According to modern Egyptologist Miroslav Verner, the general consensus today is that a labor force of no more than 30,000 was needed in the Great Pyramid's construction.

19th century Egyptologist William Flinders Petrie proposed that the labor force was largely composed not of slaves, but of the rural Egyptian population, working during periods when the Nile river was flooded, and agricultural activity suspended; this theory is accepted by many today. Verner believes that the labor was organized into a hierarchy, consisting of two gangs of 1000 men, divided into five zaa or phyle of 200 men each, which may have been further divided according to the skills of the workers.

Herodotus speculated that the stone blocks used in the Great Pyramid's construction were maneuvered into place by raising them up a succession of short wooden scaffolds. Another possibility, proposed by the ancient scholar Diodorus Siculus, was that the stones were dragged along a system of ramps to the necessary height; this theory is more widely accepted today, though there remains considerable debate over what kind of ramps may have been used. Modern scholar Mark Lehner has speculated that a spiralling ramp, beginning in the stone quarry to the southeast, and continuing around the exterior of the pyramid, may have been used. The stone blocks may have been drawn on sleds, lubricated by water.

The most precisely cut stones were reserved for the outside. Once in place their corners were smoothened to give an almost shiny outer appearance of the pyramid.

Numerical significance

Some of those who have examined the Great Pyramid have made speculations regarding the numerical significance of the dimensions, angles, and ratios present in the structure.

One popular assertion is that the ratio of the pyramid's perimeter to its height times two ( P / ( 2 × H ) ) gives a close approximation of the mathematical value π; that is, the height is to the perimeter as the radius is to the circumference of a circle. This characteristic is determined by the linear slope of one of the pyramid's sides; any pyramid with a slope of arctan ( 4 / π ), or approximately 51°51′14″, will have this characteristic.

The sides of the Great Pyramid have this approximate slope; it is peculiar in this respect, as it more closely expresses this slope than any other surviving Egyptian pyramid. William Flinders Petrie determined the weighted mean angle of the north face of the Great Pyramid to be 51°50′40″, within 35 arcseconds, or about 0.01 degrees, of an exact expression of π. Colonel Howard-Vyse, in 1837, discovered two intact and in situ casing stones, from which he determined the slope to be between 51°50′ and 51°52′15.5″, while Charles Piazzi Smyth, Astronomer Royal of Scotland, in 1865 estimated the overall angle to be 51°51′14″, based on measurements of several surviving casing stone fragments and the angle of the pyramid itself. Whether the Great Pyramid's builders intended for the structure to express π is unknown.

Additionally, Smyth claimed that the measurements he obtained from the Great Pyramid indicate a unit of length, the pyramid inch, equivalent to roughly 1.01 British inches, that could have been the standard of measurement by the pyramid's architects. From this he extrapolated a number of other measurements, including the pyramid pint, the sacred cubit, and the pyramid scale of temperature. Applying these to the dimensions of the structure, he inferred the existence of expressions of the polar diameter and mean density of the Earth, the length of a solar day, the distance from the Earth to the Sun, and the precession of the equinoxes. These derivations are frequently regarded by skeptics as having no scientific merit, and of being merely an artificial device for attributing numerical significance to the Great Pyramid's dimensions.

Paranormal and prophetical allegations

As a structure of impressive construction and mystery, the great pyramid has attracted the attention of occultists (as have many other aspects of ancient Egyptian culture). The great pyramid and the Sphinx are often alleged to have been built with mysterious ancient forces rather than human labor and/or by Atlanteans, extraterrestrials, or other mysterious creators.

It has also been alleged that the dimensions and details of the Great Pyramid, properly interpreted, provide prophecies of events in modern times. This theory was first proposed in the 1800s by John Taylor, who believed the pyramid had actually been constructed by the biblical Noah. Charles Piazzi Smyth later elaborated on this theory in his book Our Inheritance in the Great Pyramid. No scientific evidence has been found to support these allegations to date. Edgar Cayce was apparently sympathetic to the idea, though his convoluted language makes it difficult to be certain.

http://www.aegypten-online.de/images/giza/pyramid.jpg

http://www.dl.ket.org/humanities/arch/images/giza_.jpg

http://allanmatthews.8m.com/egypt/giza/giza-dusk1.jpg

http://www.unf.edu/classes/freshmancore/core1images/giza-3pyramids.jpg

Matthieu
December 5th, 2004, 03:36 PM
If perfection is possible on earth, it is this.

vigo80
December 5th, 2004, 03:46 PM
10 what else

DamienK
December 14th, 2004, 11:12 PM
10

212
December 25th, 2004, 02:08 PM
I'm not into monarchs' vanity projects, but hey, it's a 10. Utterly timeless.

Matthieu
December 28th, 2004, 07:21 PM
Even if I respect their votes. I have trouble to understand people who vote only 3 or less on that.

Trisuno
December 28th, 2004, 08:51 PM
10 without a doubt!

Bender
December 28th, 2004, 09:46 PM
I prefer not to vote. From a technical point of view, it's a marvel. But the architecture? A stack of stone...

Paolo
December 29th, 2004, 12:17 AM
one of the everlasting world wonders so no wonder 10/10

http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~semitic/hsm/InProcess/GizaPlateau1.jpg

http://www.lanecc.edu/artad/ArtHistoryProgram/images3/3-9pyramid.jpg

pics by Alfred Molon:

http://www.molon.de/galleries/Egypt/Pyramids/index.php

here is a link to an interesting satelite photo:

http://www.traumspiel.de/siteseeing/images/pyramids.jpg

SUNNI
December 29th, 2004, 04:25 PM
as stated above, it may not be an architectual , but its a structure which records history and effort

Paolo
January 6th, 2005, 12:22 AM
http://onephoto.net/uploads/kuman/1099869286_gal_img_7524_sepsm.jpg

Altaich
January 10th, 2005, 09:26 PM
Simply Great :)

tonymathew
January 10th, 2005, 10:16 PM
Here is some pictures of the Pyramid I took
http://img57.exs.cx/img57/5671/10707047sp.jpg
http://img57.exs.cx/img57/2449/10606808ax.jpg
http://img57.exs.cx/img57/2841/10606938at.jpg
im the one at the front of the second camel
http://img57.exs.cx/img57/7667/10707092lw.jpg
http://img57.exs.cx/img57/9000/11111863vk.jpg
http://img57.exs.cx/img57/346/11212448xh.jpg

Zarkon
January 10th, 2005, 10:26 PM
10/10 amazingg

Ellatur
January 11th, 2005, 01:44 AM
10

SkyHawk
January 12th, 2005, 02:32 PM
Absolutely 10!!

Fabio
January 25th, 2005, 05:56 AM
10/10


for its historic value

DRAKKO
May 26th, 2005, 07:14 PM
10/10

Phobos
May 26th, 2005, 10:08 PM
10/10

great engineering.

grenoblecity
May 26th, 2005, 10:42 PM
10

Valia
May 27th, 2005, 01:40 AM
10/10

magnifient engineering work

Dieyu why you had rated 3 or less?. I cannot understaend crapes rates

Hindustani
May 27th, 2005, 04:45 PM
http://onephoto.net/uploads/kuman/1099869286_gal_img_7524_sepsm.jpg

10/10

"The" greatest work of engineering, manual labor of all time. A timeless architectural marvel that defined a civilization through ages & still does. Absolutely breathtaking.

centralized pandemonium
May 27th, 2005, 04:47 PM
Its obvious, 10.

majormystery
November 25th, 2005, 04:05 PM
Amazing. Would have loved to have seen them with their cladding. 10

Dor. IL
November 25th, 2005, 05:49 PM
10/10

Belgrade Girl
November 26th, 2005, 01:16 AM
10

CrazyCanuck
November 26th, 2005, 01:22 AM
Anything less then a 10 would be unacceptable. so 10/10.

Arpels
November 26th, 2005, 01:38 AM
10/10

gustaveau
November 26th, 2005, 01:41 AM
It's not perfect anymore, so that's why i give a 9.5. Still a very good grade!

nex
November 26th, 2005, 01:46 AM
10/10 world ancient/modern wonder

bnmaddict
December 15th, 2005, 03:55 PM
9/10. great.

forvine
December 15th, 2005, 05:49 PM
9.5/10

SUNNY
December 16th, 2005, 04:28 PM
10/10 simply amazing

Spearman
December 23rd, 2005, 03:51 AM
Impossible to rate many of the historic ruins, none more than this. It is almost intact, even after 4000 years, but this is not about marvelous architecture, but the awesome achievement of the earliest civilization. Today it's mostly a heap of stone left, and really, that isn't all that amazing. It's not like it can collapse. But the top is mostly intact, that is impressive. And it is the most famous man-made object. Who knows how it would have looked when it was new, with smooth facades, and golden top?

Anyway, it's quite meaningless to place a vote on this.

Sinjin P.
December 23rd, 2005, 04:04 AM
10/10 A world wonder

Bitxofo
December 24th, 2005, 12:47 AM
Perfection!
10/10
:eek2::eek2:

Reflex
December 24th, 2005, 01:00 AM
10, for sure!:okay:

Medo
February 23rd, 2006, 09:13 PM
10/10

Albaniangigi
February 23rd, 2006, 09:58 PM
they're amazing, build on a dessert, over 400 feet...thousands of years ago, most countries still dont have structures that are this tall lo

for the pyramids there needs to be a seperate category cause they dont deserve just a ten

skipperBill
March 11th, 2006, 03:59 AM
10/10.

Jules
March 16th, 2006, 05:11 AM
Mind blowing, stunning, marvelous, whatever word you wanna choose. It's amazing. 10/10

Albaniangigi
March 20th, 2006, 05:31 AM
the greatest wonders of the ancient world...def 10

Sideshow_Bob
March 22nd, 2006, 12:02 AM
10/10 Marvelous!

jai_gandhi
March 23rd, 2006, 06:58 PM
10000000000000000000000/10 lol this is the best landmark of ancient times.

El_Greco
April 10th, 2006, 09:37 PM
10.

Mosaic
April 18th, 2006, 09:32 AM
10/10

crossbowman
April 27th, 2006, 12:59 AM
10/10 of course!
Who voted less than 3??? :weirdo:

Jutcho
April 27th, 2006, 02:46 PM
10/10 no need to explain why.

cmoonflyer
April 29th, 2006, 07:04 AM
10/10 or 11/10 -Absolutely !

Giorgio
April 29th, 2006, 07:11 AM
I think they are ugly but they are very important to civilisation.

empersouf
April 29th, 2006, 08:12 PM
Just impressive! 10/10

persian
April 30th, 2006, 12:31 PM
10

Ballota
May 13th, 2006, 06:16 PM
Absolute perfection!

10/10

:master:

--------------------------

Btw. what about this Las Vegas monstrosity:
http://www.sportstravel.com/images/elements/21/Luxor.jpg

:crazy:

Roar/
June 8th, 2006, 04:06 PM
10 I think it is amazing they have lasted so long and the way they were constucted!

sharpie20
June 22nd, 2006, 02:05 AM
I'm convinced that aliens made it, and in about 300 years the teleportation thing that they've built inside the pyramids will activate and then they will send hordes of aliens to take over the planet, just my 2 cents

Principes
July 1st, 2006, 09:37 AM
7.5/10

clarky
July 1st, 2006, 11:30 AM
10/10

virarch
July 6th, 2006, 01:07 AM
9.5/10

A stunning architectural accomplishment with unparalleled civil engineering precision for millenniums.

Stiggen
July 6th, 2006, 08:29 PM
10

cmoonflyer
July 21st, 2006, 09:07 AM
Keep the thread coming !

Dreamlıneя
August 3rd, 2006, 01:27 AM
9 ;)

gutooo
September 9th, 2006, 01:02 PM
How can people vote less than 10????

10 for sure!

delmaule
September 14th, 2006, 06:49 PM
9/10

(((myx)))
November 12th, 2006, 10:41 AM
10. always impressive!

Kelsen
November 26th, 2006, 03:58 AM
10/10 for sure! :bow:

SactoSpam
December 6th, 2006, 01:32 AM
Do we even need a pole for this one? 10/10!

Sbz2ifc
January 15th, 2007, 02:17 AM
10

Nadini
January 15th, 2007, 06:13 PM
10 obviously!

[Jmlr]
March 1st, 2007, 09:27 AM
10/10
this is perfection

Posener
March 4th, 2007, 01:21 AM
10 is the only note I can give

Miso
March 4th, 2007, 01:26 AM
1000000!!!!!! :bow:

without a doubt :master:


It just can be named ARCHITECTURE:drool:

Miso
March 4th, 2007, 01:28 AM
I want to know why this users (
cold, Dieyu, tv123) give it 3 or less!!!


:ohno:

really, it would be interesting :)

marpa
June 8th, 2007, 02:15 PM
10/10

Online
July 3rd, 2007, 06:22 AM
10/10 Increíble

Popiel
July 5th, 2007, 03:14 AM
10/10

tykho
August 8th, 2007, 10:24 PM
10/10 Perfect

forzagrifo
August 10th, 2007, 01:27 AM
it is an insult to humanity to give this a rating.

Ekumenopolis
August 10th, 2007, 01:36 AM
A giant building in the middle of the desert that can last 4500+ years, is at least a 15/10.. but if i cant vote that, 10 for sure.

Gregor
August 31st, 2007, 12:10 AM
10!/10

goschio
September 4th, 2007, 08:09 AM
Generally like the shape and the facade material. However, looks poorly maintained. Therefore only 9/10

firefox2
September 4th, 2007, 10:12 PM
A treasure of the human spirit, but needs some maintenance

Sound.
September 19th, 2007, 07:24 PM
10/10

LMCA1990
February 20th, 2008, 07:22 AM
10/10

mondechampion
March 3rd, 2008, 05:31 AM
10/10, enough said!

those that voted below 3, should be banned from SSC, this poll should be used to test who're qualified for membership of SSC.

LAZO
March 12th, 2008, 11:44 AM
10/10

GregPz
March 13th, 2008, 10:23 AM
10. Couldn't possibly get a score lower than 10.

Spartan_X
March 28th, 2008, 11:37 AM
The last of the 7 ancient wonders that still stands. And it will be still standing for centuries, maybe for thousands of years. Its one of the most mysterious buildings on earth, with some of its secrets still well-kept. Possibly its the most recognizable too. 10.

LordMandeep
April 1st, 2008, 02:13 AM
10/10 no doubt...

BlackLukes
April 2nd, 2008, 08:44 PM
9/10

Fundador
April 22nd, 2008, 02:29 AM
double wow:) 10/10

ZZ-II
May 11th, 2008, 08:58 PM
10/10 without any doubt

Nielsiej13
May 11th, 2008, 09:04 PM
9,5/10

Nikkodemo
May 29th, 2008, 12:16 AM
:applause:

10/10

Barriga-Verde
May 31st, 2008, 09:18 PM
10/10 ;)

Astralis
June 1st, 2008, 05:33 PM
10/10

xX60Xx
September 24th, 2008, 06:38 AM
I don't know what to sayabout these,
the only thing i can say is how did does people voted 3 or less, maybe they didnt know about the history of it.

anyways 10/10

big-dog
September 24th, 2008, 06:59 AM
10/10 no doubt about it

Kawasaki_Kragujevac
October 16th, 2008, 06:53 PM
10/10

stasiua
October 16th, 2008, 07:00 PM
What I can write, what I can say:) the Icon, the symbol. Priceless:)

10/10


weblogUpdates.ping SkyscraperCity - Powered by vBulletin http://www.skyscrapercity.com/