Legal Brothel in Vancouver? | News [Archive] - SkyscraperCity

PDA

View Full Version : Legal Brothel in Vancouver? | News


mr.x
November 13th, 2007, 02:29 AM
Coalition pushes for legal brothel during Olympics
Ottawa's support sought for safe, prostitute-run facility that would cater to Olympic visitors

Jeff Lee, Vancouver Sun
Published: Sunday, November 11, 2007

VANCOUVER -- A group of Vancouver prostitutes wants to open a "co-op" brothel in time for the Winter Olympics, saying it would help sex-trade workers by providing a safer working environment when the world comes to visit in 2010.

Susan Davis, a working prostitute, said she envisions the creation of as many as five cooperative brothels if the B.C. Coalition of Experiential Communities -- which includes men, women and transgendered sex-trade workers -- convinces the federal government to permit the first brothel on an experimental basis.

The group has support from some politicians, including Vancouver East MP Libby Davies and Vancouver Mayor Sam Sullivan, who believe a brothel owned and run by sex-trade workers would help reduce violence against them.

Davis said the group is weeks away from incorporating a cooperative corporation and is looking for a possible location in the city's east-side Strathcona area. But she said the group won't open the facility, complete with "quickie rooms" equipped with sinks and a bench, unless it has support from the federal government.

"What we'd like to see is an exemption given to us along the lines of what was given for the Insite safe-injection site," Davis said.

She believes tens of thousands of men who come to Vancouver during the Games will be searching for sex. B.C.'s booming construction economy has already brought thousands of workers, and along with them, prostitutes, she said.

"Just like the workers are coming from all over the world to build the city, sex workers are coming with them," she said.

Sullivan, who said the city needs a new approach to dealing with the problems of prostitution, doesn't object to the idea of a co-op brothel.

But he said he's more focused on helping so-called "survival sex-trade" workers find cures to their addiction.

"I believe we need to keep an open mind," he said. "But I don't believe it would address the needs of the survival sex trade. I don't think a brothel of this kind would even allow women like that into it, because they come with lots of problems."

Opponents of the brothel say it would only perpetuate the idea that prostitution is acceptable, and not solve the abuse heaped on women in an industry most of them don't want to be in.

"It entrenches prostitution as legitimate, and therefore legitimatizes pimps and traffickers," said Daisy Kler, a social worker with Vancouver Rape Relief. "I do not believe the public would agree that this is a good idea, to have some disposable women available for the Olympics."

Last week, Calgary-based The Future Group released a report warning that Vancouver's Olympics will be a target of human traffickers wanting to exploit prostitution. The report, titled Faster, Higher, Stronger: Preventing Human Trafficking at the 2010 Olympics, said the federal and provincial governments need to deter traffickers from using the Games to profit from human misery.

Janine Benedet, an associate professor of law at the University of B.C., said the city already has hundreds of brothels. The only difference is that they operate illegally. Bringing in one for the Olympics, she said, is wrong.

"To the question, 'Is society ready for this?' my answer is, 'I hope not,'" said Benedet, who lectures on sexual violence. "The notion that this is somehow different or better than any of the other brothels out there is simply false."

Studies show more than 90 per cent of women in the sex trade are not there by choice, but rather because of trafficking, drug addiction and societal problems such as incest.

Benedet said the majority of Vancouver's prostitutes are native women, and many of them suffer from deep psychological trauma. Davis said a brothel run as a cooperative would not turn away prostitutes looking for a safe and clean place to do their business.

The trial of Robert Pickton, who is accused of the first-degree murder of 26 women, all of whom were either survival sex-trade workers or addicts, amplifies that point, she said.

"It would be better to be working inside in a bad place than it would be to be outside and getting killed," she said. "Our main focus is to help the adult prostitutes. We're focusing on the Downtown Eastside first because that's where so many of them are getting killed."

Davis said the co-op has the support of federal politicians, including Davies, Liberal MP Hedy Fry and Senator Larry Campbell, the former Vancouver mayor. Davies said she supports the coalition's idea of the co-op, and also wants to see prostitution decriminalized.

Society's prohibitionist stance against the sex trade hasn't solved the problem that men continue to seek out women for sex, she said. While she is opposed to child prostitution, she doesn't think adult prostitution should be illegal.

"Where there is sex between two consenting adults, even if there is money exchanged, I don't think the state should prohibit it," Davies said. "I think even the police would agree that the current situation is not tolerable, and that we need safer conditions for sex-trade workers."

But Vancouver police department spokesman Const. Tim Fanning said a brothel can't legitimize an industry that completely victimizes women.

"You can call it what you want, but prostitution is just a breath short of slavery," he said. "These women are not in it by choice. The police department would in no way support anything like a brothel."

Davis said better "exit" strategies are needed to help prostitutes who want to leave the industry. But she thinks prostitution as a whole should be accepted instead of stigmatized. She said as an example, she services many elderly men whose wives either won't have sex with them or who are widowers and don't want long-term relations.

But Kler saw Davis's proposal as a thinly disguised attempt to legalize an industry she sees as akin to slavery.

"Fundamentally, it's not the laws that kill, beat and rape women, it's men," she said. "The mantra in this city is that it's safer, it's safer, it's safer. We fundamentally see prostitution as a form of violence against women. If you are coming from a women's equality perspective, as we are, fighting for the equal status of women, we see that there is no benefit to women as a group to legalizing or decriminalizing prostitution."

The idea of brothels is not new to Vancouver. In 2005, then-councillor Tim Louis suggested the city should open one to support prostitutes as long as it didn't make money from it, prompting Sullivan, then a mayoral candidate, to say: "The goal should be to help these women get out of the survival sex trade, not keep them in it. I'm running to be mayor to help people, not to get into the business of being a pimp."

But the approach of the Winter Games has brought the issue to the fore again. The Olympics, like many major sporting events, traditionally generate a boost in prostitution.

Victor Malarek, author of the best-selling book The Natashas: Inside the New Global Sex Trade, said more than 40,000 women and girls were brought to Athens for the 2004 Summer Games.

For the 2006 FIFA World Cup in Germany, more than 20,000 women were imported. In both countries, prostitution is legal, but the vast majority of those brought in were foreigners from countries like Moldova, Romania and Ukraine.

While Canada's immigration laws and visa requirements will prevent many foreign prostitutes from being trafficked in Vancouver for the Games, Malarek says the reality is that the 2010 Winter Games will be no different than other Olympics.

"You're going to open up a Pandora's box if you allow even one legal brothel," he said.

Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day, the federal government's senior minister in B.C., and the Vancouver Organizing Committee declined to comment.

jefflee@png.canwest.com


© Vancouver Sun





i actually do think prostitution should be legal....it's all about two consenting adults - regardless of money. but a brothel? the feds are already having a hard time with the drug injection site.

DrT
November 13th, 2007, 03:39 AM
She believes tens of thousands of men who come to Vancouver during the Games will be searching for sex.

Yes they will, if they think it is easily availble.
What individuals do consentually is up to them and should not be illegal, but I'm against a big public display with neon lights advertising, Come in Here for Sex.
Just in poor taste.

EastVanMark
November 14th, 2007, 04:15 AM
Bless those hard working women (wipes tear from eye):cry:

Rhino
November 14th, 2007, 04:19 AM
wow , what is this the 1800's ? I dont think this should be allowed . Whats next , a Legal Crack house ? or somewhere where you can take your wife and beat her whit out fear of the police because you sign in ? You allow this and your oppening a flood gate of immoral crap into a wonderful country .

spongeg
November 15th, 2007, 05:04 AM
prostitution is not illegal

the illegal part is the solicitation part

its never going to go away - the workers are better off in a house - i am sure a lot of them could than get more help and a lot might end up leaving the profession ironically

Rhino
November 15th, 2007, 09:40 PM
maybe , but reguardless of how much better it may be for them , it will still send the wrong mesage to EVERYONE else .

The_Dude
November 19th, 2007, 06:10 AM
maybe , but reguardless of how much better it may be for them , it will still send the wrong mesage to EVERYONE else .
Yeah because when anyone thinks of Holland or Germany the first thing that comes to mind is prostitution.
Does it really matter what a few religious nutjobs or conservative fearmongers think if it'll give prostitutes a bit more safety and potentially mean a less unpleasant scene in parts of the city? Prostitution is here and isn't going to go away anytime soon so what's wrong with making it as safe and unobtrusive as possible?

The Islander
November 19th, 2007, 10:22 AM
I think the Dude is right. I also think what is completely immoral is to try to make a statement telling how people should live.

By keeping brothels illegal while prostitutes face rape, assault and even death on a regular basis, we are inadvertantly hurting them... Believe it or not, they are people too. Legalization of regulated brothels is a viable option.

And Rhino, who are you to say what the right message is? I dont think that i need anyone to make moral descisions for me.

Just a thought....

Reddog794
November 19th, 2007, 05:07 PM
Everybody is talking like this has never been done before. Look at London, or even Amsterdam. They both have well run red-light districts, have been for years. Why don't we look at how they approach it, the pros and cons of each model. I mean nothing can be perfect but at least we can set something up with the best of what we have.

Islander, I agree with you completely.

DrT
November 19th, 2007, 09:00 PM
^^
We already have enough trouble keeping public order in the entertainment district on Granville and enough druggies and bums on the east side. All we need is a red light district to add to the misery.
"Well run" is relative. Red light districts are still not great places to hang out or live.

Canuck514
November 20th, 2007, 12:17 AM
wow , what is this the 1800's ? I dont think this should be allowed . Whats next , a Legal Crack house ? or somewhere where you can take your wife and beat her whit out fear of the police because you sign in ? You allow this and your oppening a flood gate of immoral crap into a wonderful country .

Wow are you ever a redneck! Wake up, dude! Are you a Christian zealot because you certainly sound like one! I'm sure you think Amsterdam is just so bad...when actually they have far less social problems than we do because they accept the realities of humanity. Sex will never go away and neither will prostitution. LEGALISE IT! It is not immoral, nor should you have the right to tell other people how to live their lives. If you don't like it, stay away from it and let the others enjoy it in a safe, controlled, and legalised environment!

Canuck514
November 20th, 2007, 12:19 AM
I think the Dude is right. I also think what is completely immoral is to try to make a statement telling how people should live.

By keeping brothels illegal while prostitutes face rape, assault and even death on a regular basis, we are inadvertantly hurting them... Believe it or not, they are people too. Legalization of regulated brothels is a viable option.

And Rhino, who are you to say what the right message is? I dont think that i need anyone to make moral descisions for me.

Just a thought....

AMEN to you!

Rhino
November 20th, 2007, 02:16 AM
well , I can admit that maybe My ideas of what is right and wrong maybe differant then others , but who am I to judge how others feel and what others believe .
And no Im not a religious fanatic what so ever , but in the same moment , who is everyone here to tell me that I am wrong ?

Taller, Better
November 20th, 2007, 03:03 AM
wow , what is this the 1800's ? I dont think this should be allowed . Whats next , a Legal Crack house ? or somewhere where you can take your wife and beat her whit out fear of the police because you sign in ? You allow this and your oppening a flood gate of immoral crap into a wonderful country .

"You allow this and your oppening a flood gate of immoral crap into a wonderful country"

allowing a gate of immoral crap in? Are you aware that there has been prostitution in Canada for the better part of the past five centuries?
Let me explain the difference to you between beating your wife, and prostitution. Prostitution is between two consenting adults. Wife beating is not. Wife beating has victims. Consensual prostitution
(the type in a civilised legalized society) does not.
See the difference?

Keeping prostitution from being legalized means keeping it unsafe for the workers. They must put themselves into danger every day simply because they cannot operate out of a legal and safe house.
We all know what happened to a great many prostitutes in Vancouver because of the stigmatization in our society toward them. Bite the bullet and legalize it. Clean it up and tax it, and set aside the moral outrage... our laws should not be based on someone's personal "morals".

DrT
November 20th, 2007, 05:32 PM
^^
I am in complete agreement on the issue T,B.
My beef is to have it concentrated to one city or one small area of one city (ie, a red light district), or allow it for one event, like the Olympics.
If the government legalizes the business, they should do that at the federal level, or at least, on a provincial level, so that one small area doesn't become the mecca for these services, drawing sex tourists from all over the face of the earth to the one spot that may be where you may happen to live. If it is legal, it should be legal everywhere.

CrazyCanuck
November 20th, 2007, 10:45 PM
They might DrT, but they might use the Olympics as a trial run first, if all goes well....

Huhu
November 20th, 2007, 11:36 PM
^^ I'm not sure about showcasing something like prostitution during the Olympics, not something I want my city associated with despite the "success" of Amsterdam or anywhere else.

I'm concerned that legalizing prostitution will expand the market, since it would change the conception of it within the mindset of certain people who wouldn't have done it had it remained illegal and inconspicuous. When it becomes freely available and visible due to mass advertising, more people would likely be drawn to it. I dunno, that's my theory.

Also there's the unresolved problem of trafficking in women, which is rampant even in LEGAL redlight districts in London, Amsterdam, etc. In my opinion it's one of the most disgusting crimes possible, so I'm loathe to support an "industry" that would increase the likely hood of women from developing countries being exploited like so much cattle. This leads me back to the argument that allowing prostitutes to freely advertise would expand the market, which would make the trafficking situation worse.

IMHO legalizing certain drugs, allowing free injection centres, etc. are all fine by me, but I draw the line at legal brothels. Just my $0.02.

The_Dude
November 21st, 2007, 07:31 AM
Wow some good points from both sides of the issue. I'd like to address Huhu's arguments though with some of my thoughts.

First: Expanding the market is not necessarily a bad thing. People who didn't have sex with prostitutes before are unlikely to suddenly start banging away with the local ladies of the night simply because there's been a change in laws. And even if they did I'd rather have the horny buggers going at it with a consenting person paid or otherwise than any of the other less pleasant possibilities.

Second: Yes human trafficking of any sort is bad, it's also happening as we speak in Vancouver and other Canadian cities. If prostitution were legalised prostitutes would also have to be registered etc. because they'd no longer be working "under the table" as it were (Clintonesque innuendo not intended) their incomes would be taxed as well. Hence registered prostitutes would be on file as would diseases etc. if any. Unregistered and hence illegal prostitutes offering no such safety to customers would more than likely see a sharp drop off in business. And most importantly if there were no money to be made from them there'd be no reason to traffick in women in Canada. And by regulating the industry those illicit participants would face much more legal scrutiny than now where there's no oversight and no real way of distinguishing people forced into the business from those willingly carrying on their chosen profession or at the very least making a living to support their family or any for any other of their own motivations.

Probably pie in the sky BS from my little mind but that's how I see it, please feel free to tear me down and expose my idiocy where you all see fit. :)


weblogUpdates.ping SkyscraperCity - Powered by vBulletin http://www.skyscrapercity.com/